This is a mail from Andrew Ross which sets out a possible framework for Eclipse Foundation Location Tech Group sponsorship of FOSS4G 2013. I haven't agreed to this yet, I would like to get your thoughts either prior to the F2F or on the 6th.

Steven
_____________________

Steven Feldman

_____________________
KnowWhere Consulting

m: +44 (0) 7958 924 101

w:  knowwhere
t:   @StevenFeldman
skype: stevenfeldman2638

Begin forwarded message:

From: Andrew Ross <andrew.ross@eclipse.org>
Date: 31 August 2012 16:01:47 GMT+01:00
To: Steven Feldman <shfeldman@gmail.com>
Subject: Fwd: [location-iwg] On events

Hi Steven,

Below is a copy of a message that I sent out to the LocationTech community regarding events. I intentionally framed it in a generic manner rather than FOSS4G 2013 specific.

In the context of FOSS4G, it is my belief there will be interest from LocationTech members.

Our discussions have created a basic framework for potential involvement. For instance:
1) LocationTech guarantees a minimum level of sponsorship and attendees in exchange for a discount. As a hypothetical example, >=$45K sponsorship + 20 attendee minimum commitment in exchange for a 20% discount. Naturally this offer could be made to others as well.
2) LocationTech projects and members pitch proposals for the program. They are considered based on merit by the program committee like any other.
3) Assuming 1 & 2, visible LocationTech branding as part of the event. Possible examples might be a pavilion, archway(s) to the main plenary room, etc. Naturally the space will dictate what makes sense to do.
4) There will be interest in some content for non-developers. As per my tool makers, tradespeople, and people needing solutions comment.
5) If all the above works out nicely, then I may pursue approval from our Steering committee for additional support. e.g. code sprint sponsorship, video sponsorship, etc. and a mandate to actively help promote the event.

The next step is to ensure everyone is comfortable with this agreement in principle. We can pursue a formal agreement once I have enough firm commitment lined up so as to avoid incurring unnecessary risk for the Foundation.

The following lists are intended to be informational and not imply commitment on their behalf.

A list of notable names involved with LocationTech publicly include: IBM, Oracle, OpenGeo, Autodesk, CARIS, AGI, RadiantBlue, Actian, MapSherpa, MapGears, Spatialytics, and more. There are others very interested in LocationTech, likely easy to guess, but not yet appropriate to list here since they have not revealed themselves just yet for whatever reason.

A list of notable names who are Eclipse Foundation members & have an obvious interest in location technology: Nokia, Google, SAP, Airbus, BMW, Bosch, Continental, Thales, Hitachi, Seimens, RIM, etc.

Andrew

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [location-iwg] On events
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:52:06 -0400
From: Andrew Ross <andrew.ross@eclipse.org>
Reply-To: Location Industry Working Group discussions <location-iwg@eclipse.org>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation
To: Location IWG <location-iwg@eclipse.org>


Hi Everyone,

A few items had to be slipped from today's meeting agenda to make time 
for the great discussions.

I'd like to talk about events. As background, the Eclipse Foundation 
organizes two big annual conferences each year - EclipseCon and 
EclipseCon Europe. Organizing these events are one of the many services 
the Foundation provides to the community. These events provide outreach, 
education, foster camaraderie, networking, marketing, code sprints, 
cross-pollination between projects, and so much more.

There is a natural interest to provide similar services as part of 
LocationTech. The obvious options are:
1) Do a LocationTech sub-conference of EclipseCon/EclipseCon Europe
2) Do stand-alone conferences for LocationTech
3) Get involved with other established events, such as FOSS4G as a 
notable example.

These options are not necessarily mutually exclusive.

I'd like to inquire what people think about this?

I anticipate that LocationTech presence at other events is an important 
part of our outreach & marketing strategy. I believe LocationTech's 
collective influence can help bring additional value to members & 
participants. The basic premise is that in exchange for securing a 
minimum level of participation we would receive a discount on 
registration and sponsorship.

As a hypothetical example, say LocationTech guaranteed at least the 
value of a Platinum and a Gold sponsorship position and at least 20 
attendees at an event, then our members & committers would receive an X% 
"bulk" discount. The sponsorship packages nor registrations would not 
change... they merely cost less. The idea is that we can strengthen 
other events, bring more value to our participants, and grow our ecosystem.

There may be some potential to build on the "Friends of Eclipse" program 
and offer a LocationTech annual subscription. For example, $49 a year 
gives you a discount at many events, a discount with many vendors, 
access to conference videos sooner, downloads from faster servers, etc.

I greatly value your thoughts on this. Thank you,

Andrew
_______________________________________________
location-iwg mailing list
location-iwg@eclipse.org
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/location-iwg